Community Board 2 Unanimously Rejects NYU's Expansion Plans

Written By Daniel Muhlenberg | February 27, 2012
2019%2f09%2f13%2f12%2f28%2f36%2f0c392502 c29e 4280 a356 c27470a2d42b%2ffile

New York University’s contentious relationship with residents of Greenwich Village was on full display last week when Community Board 2 unanimously voted against NYU’s 2031 expansion plan. This came as no surprise; in dozens of public hearings held earlier this year, the vast majority of community members were clearly opposed to NYU’s plans. Last Thursday, that opposition crystallized in the one venue that residents of Greenwich Village apartments have to voice their concerns. How much this vote will matter is an entirely different subject, however, and again raises the issue of New York City’s rezoning methodology, one that makes community members little more than spectators.

In its current form NYU’s 2031 expansion plan would add a number of large academic, housing, and luxury apartment buildings to the super-blocks between Laguardia Place and Mercer Street north of Houston Street; it’s is a huge new construction project that would expand their campus by over 3 million square feet and cost roughly $6 billion. The board had multiple concerns about the project. Primary among them were the loss of neighborhood character around Washington Square Park, removal of smaller public parks in the area, the further decline of affordable housing stock, and the unavoidable fact that they’ll have to endure over 20 years of construction.

For better or worse, Community Board 2’s vote will probably not effect what actually gets built. Of far greater importance are the negotiations and compromises that will take place during the lengthy city zoning review process. The process includes advisory reviews by Manhattan Borough President Scott Stringer's office and the City Planning Commission and culminates in a vote by the City Council. While these government bodies might consider the objections of residents, it’s likely that Community Board 2’s vote will have little relevance in the proceedings. If nothing else, their vote removed any ambiguity as to where the the Greenwich Village community stands, even if they can’t do much to stop NYU from moving forward.

Blog Archive


This information is not verified for authenticity or accuracy and is not guaranteed and may not reflect all real estate activity in the market. © 2021 REBNY Listing Service, Inc. All rights reserved. RLS IDX Data display by Elegran LLC. IDX information is provided exclusively for consumers’ personal, non- commercial use and that it may not be used for any purpose other than to identify prospective properties consumers may be interested in purchasing.

Elegran LLC may or may not be the exclusive listing agent of the properties being displayed on All data displayed on is presented for informational purposes only and should be independently confirmed by all customers. All Information is compiled from both public and private sources including, but not limited to the RLS, MLS and ACRIS; each of which is assumed to be reliable. All information displayed is subject to errors and omissions regarding apartment specifications and final sale prices, and further, any unit listed may have had its listing withdrawn without notice subsequent to such information being compiled. No representation is made as to the accuracy of any description (ie: listing, close sale data, and/or building description) of any building or individual unit. All measurements and square footage are approximate and all information herein should be confirmed by customer and/or their attorney. Elegran LLC, its members, affiliates, and contributors adhere to New Your City, New York State, and United States Fair Housing Laws.