L-Train Alternatives: Of Venetian-style Vaporettos and Giant Inflatable Condoms

Written By Zain Ul-Arifeen | June 22, 2016 | Published in Neighborhood News
2016%2f06%2f22%2f18%2f19%2f34%2f01d11b48 1018 409d afa7 2e4e30898138%2fwater taxi 271360 960 720

Earlier this month, we reported the anxiously awaited shutdown of the L-train in 2019. The MTA intends to perform thorough repairs to the Canarsie Tunnels after Hurricane Sandy corroded them. We outlined solutions that had been touted and seemed realistic – including calls for expanded bus service over Williamsburg Bridge, and diverting traffic to other train lines, such as the G and the M trains. As the L-train carries 300,000 commuters between Manhattan and North Brooklyn, an eminent shutdown could be catastrophic for people and businesses if the city has no alternative planned.

Sharing our distress about the L-train apocalypse, last week the Van Alen Institute in Manhattan invited the public to brainstorm alternatives in an “L-Train Shutdown Charette” for $1000 in prize-money. Happold Engineering’s Youngjin Yi, a mechanical engineer, and Kohn Pedersen Fox’s Dillon Pranger, an architect, took the prize. They proposed running Venetian, vaporetto-style ferry service from Newton Creek transporting passengers to and from Manhattan. The second part of the proposal suggested running a commuter rail on the Long Island Rail Road freight track, which runs parallel to the L-line, between Fresh Pond Junction and the Bushwick branch — A very realistic and potentially life-saving solution for many New Yorkers, if a bit of a project for the MTA to make happen.

While it might be an extensive project, it pales in comparison to another proposal: A brilliantly outrageous one by an engineering company called AECOM. The idea entails constructing a 2,400 foot long, partially submerged, inflatable tunnel across the East River, created by fibre-glass fabric made by a company that works for NASA. Yes, by Jove, an inflatable tunnel! The “Light Transporter” tunnel, which one of the designers of the proposal likened to a “giant condom” leaves everything trailing in its wake in terms of sheer audacity and innovativeness. Realistically, though, we think it’s safe to assume that the NASA-quality technology and funding required is way too ambitious for MTA. Maybe in 2050?


Mentioned neighborhoods


Blog Archive


This information is not verified for authenticity or accuracy and is not guaranteed and may not reflect all real estate activity in the market. © 2021 REBNY Listing Service, Inc. All rights reserved. RLS IDX Data display by Elegran LLC. IDX information is provided exclusively for consumers’ personal, non- commercial use and that it may not be used for any purpose other than to identify prospective properties consumers may be interested in purchasing.

Elegran LLC may or may not be the exclusive listing agent of the properties being displayed on Elegran.com. All data displayed on Elegran.com is presented for informational purposes only and should be independently confirmed by all customers. All Information is compiled from both public and private sources including, but not limited to the RLS, MLS and ACRIS; each of which is assumed to be reliable. All information displayed is subject to errors and omissions regarding apartment specifications and final sale prices, and further, any unit listed may have had its listing withdrawn without notice subsequent to such information being compiled. No representation is made as to the accuracy of any description (ie: listing, close sale data, and/or building description) of any building or individual unit. All measurements and square footage are approximate and all information herein should be confirmed by customer and/or their attorney. Elegran LLC, its members, affiliates, and contributors adhere to New Your City, New York State, and United States Fair Housing Laws.